Which change management approach should be used in conditions of high risk?

In conditions of high risk, the power-coercive change management approach is particularly effective because it relies on the use of authority and the exertion of influence to implement changes quickly and decisively. This method is advantageous in situations where immediate action is necessary to mitigate potential threats or to stabilize an organization that is facing significant challenges.

The power-coercive approach is characterized by direct orders from leadership, which can be critical when speed and compliance are crucial for navigating high-risk circumstances. Leaders utilizing this strategy may need to ensure that the change is not just accepted but also implemented consistently across all levels of the organization to safeguard against further risks.

While other approaches, such as participative or adaptive strategies, can foster collaboration and invite input from various stakeholders, they might take longer to implement and may not address urgent needs effectively. Similarly, nudge theory, which encourages desired behaviors through subtle adjustments, may lack the forcefulness required in high-stakes environments where decisive action is essential. Therefore, using a power-coercive approach allows organizations to manage change swiftly and assertively under high-risk conditions.